Are Democrats Pansies?

Well, you would hear it much from the progressives: How democrats can’t get their agenda passed despite winning the presidency and the supermajority in the Senate. And much talk about Republicans able to push stuff through.

Don’t buy it. Which part of conservative agenda did George Bush manage to push through in 8 years? Entitlement reform? Privatizing social security? Nothing. Well, yes, tax cuts who the hell votes against them?

Now, Republicans are currently in love with Scott Brown, the new dude from Massachusetts. Well, that’s because they are in the opposition and the only power they have is the power to say No. Brown strengthens that.

If Republicans actually had a majority–let alone a supermajority–it would naturally mean having moderate senators who had exasperate their base as much Lincoln or Byah do to the liberals. Let republicans win majority in Senate and the base would be threatening primary against Brown in about 3 weeks. Because he simply cannot vote like Jim Demint does. His constituents will not stand it. And every politician at the end of the day is motivated by self-preservation.

The US Senate and its rules–arcane as they may seem–ensure that the country cannot lurch too far to the Left or the Right anytime.

Friedman’s Maths

Thomas Friedman, The New Yotk Times columnist quoteth,

As we got into it, it was clear to me I was getting cut off from a lot of my readers in India and China where 50 dollars per year would be equal to a quarter of college tuition,” Friedman recently told me by phone. “What was coming to me anecdotally from my travels was the five worst words that as a columnist you ever want to hear: ‘I used to read you before you went behind the wall.’” [link] (emphasis added)

That’s five words?

Incidentally, The Grey Lady has decided to charge for content from 2011. A good move if you ask me.

To Blog or…

It’s really hard to blog after such a long hiatus. You lose the feel, the mood; readers lose interest (not this blog had too many ever), and it just seems more convenient not to start again. It’s almost like trying to blog for the first time which is hard enough. So with some trepidation, I resume. Let’s see if it is sustained.

In other news, Jyoti Basu has died. Considering the catastrophic consequences of his leadership of Bengal,  can’t say I am terribly bothered.

TOI’s Leaps of Logic

Okay, maybe I am too dumb to get this, but what is this supposed to mean?

When work started, the lake had 4-feet-and-3-inch water and the people of Pushkar were hopeful that they would soon have a cleaner, deeper lake, which had been desilted,” said Radhe Shyam Sharma of Pushkar Market Association. He said when last year the district administration started desilting work the lake became wider and deeper and as a result could not conserve rainwater for even a week. The lake’s depth was 15 feet, but this increased to 25 feet. Rainwater is the primary source for the lake. [link](Emphasis added)

Is there any reason if the lake became deeper it could not, “as a result”,  conserve water?

Maybe, the IITians can tell us…

Of course, the possibility that this might be another example of TOI’s inept reporting simply does not arise…

Obama’s War

I don’t follow the news much these days but is it really true that Barack Obama is fighting a war with Fox News? The President of the United States, the world’s most powerful man, owner of the biggest pulpit in the country, fighting with Glenn Beck–a recovering alcoholic for heaven’s sake?

Obama really needs to grow up and stop behaving like a petulant celebrity. I mean, what next? Paparazzi beatings?

But then

Friedman’s Next

If you want to know the name of Thomas Friedman’s next book, it’s right here.

People’ power.

He repeats it like, what, 20 times in a 800 word article? And you know what that means, right? Another atrocious book is on its way.

Now, even someone as singularly stupid as Friedman could not be so unaware of the history of Berlin Wall: it’s fall was a result of Soviet defeat in the Cold War. By the time the Berlin wall was brought down, much of Soviet empire had collapsed to the extent that in the next couple of years, the country it self would break up in 15 different independent republics.

It was hardly as if the Wall disappeared one fine day when West Berliners decided to jump over and see what the fuss is all about. As Friedman pretends. Well, perhaps, they did. Looking for good sex, I guess.

The only reason why Friedman uses the Berlin Wall example is because of the dates: 9/11 vs 11/9. Jeebus, he really needs to grow up.

The Plan

CNN-IBN informs us that the government has a plan to get M.F Hussain back from his self-imposed exile due to frivolous cases filed against him. What that plan may be,

According to sources, Husain’s self-imposed exile may come to an end if a plan being worked out by the UPA succeeds. CNN-IBN has learnt that the Government is making its first move to try and come to the rescue of Hussain.

Home Ministry sources have confirmed that cases filled across the country against Husain should be expedited. This will enable the Government to work out a focussed strategy to bring Husain back.[link]

Can anyone figure out a plan here? Or maybe in the babudom planning to work out a ”focussed strategy” is a plan in it self?

And notice the language: Home ministry sources say the cases ‘’should” be expedited. Don’t remember anyone in any context ever claiming that cases should go slow!

As the rest of the story suggests, this so-called exclusive is a case of manufacturing headlines. I didn’t bother checking the video but I am sure it must have been accompanied by ‘B’ grade Hindi movie music.

In other news, Dr Ramakrishnan is discovering that he suddenly has a lot friends.

Chalo!

In ripe old age…but still!

Congratulations and such. Name the first one Tinnu! :D

Life’s a Bitch!

Or is it? An old favorite.

p.s Blogging would be very light till July–even by the standards of this blog. Be good.

Now, Come On!

Writes Paul Lewis,

Quite so – so why not produce some green-tops and have their batsmen wondering about things other than how many centuries they will score and whether it will be Goanese fish curry for lunch?

The answer, of course, is money. New Zealand Cricket, like every other cricket board in the world, is terrified of India because they are the new powerbrokers; the Keepers Of The Cash.

Their money has cascaded through the game like acid rain, eroding the old order.

Cricket boards and players alike have been seduced by the bounty.

If we’d offended them by producing a green-top and running through them like a prune and licorice vindaloo, well, India might not return and might use their power to squeeze New Zealand out of lucrative events and tours.[link]

I despise much of what BCCI does. They are frequently liable to behave like a bunch of thugs punch drunk on power and money–witness their bullying of ICL affiliated players commentating on the New Zealand series.

But even then, this goes a little too far. I don’t think BCCI has reached the stage where it  can dictate pitches on tours. I mean, what next? India did not fold up on the fourth  day because Lalit Modi called NZ IPL players and told them he will throw them out of the cash-rich tournament if they dared to bowl well.

The real reason why NZC is preparing the pitches it is (indeed, most boards in the world), is because they make more money if matches last the whole distance. Quite simply, a five day test match yields far more revenues–from gate collections to television rights–than a three day match on a greentop. The Indian series is obviously lucrative–the NZC board expects to make nearly NZ$25 million from it–and it wants to milk it for it all it can. India can afford to ignore such concerns–even here, we are hardly preparing the kind of dust-bowls common in the early 1990s–because for the Indian board, test match earnings are loose change they would probably not even notice if they popped out of Lalit Modi’s pockets.

Silly to blame BCCI for that! And really, in Zaheer Khan and Ishant Sharma, India has probably one of the world’s best new ball attacks. Hard to imagine they would be cowering in their boots if they had to play on a greentop. Perhaps, that is another significant reason why it is not easy to frighten India these days by preparing bouncy pitches: The Indian cricket team is simply more skillful and better balanced than a lot of teams which have toured before.

And finally, if the Indian board was as powerful as Lewis claims, they would never tour–after all, the tv rights as well as gate collections are owned by the home board. Arguably, the Indian board makes very little money when they tour. And boy, does the BCCI love money! Hell, if BCCI had its way completely, both one day as well test cricket would be disbanded and we would play five IPL tournament a year or maybe more depending upon Lalit Modi’s moods.

p.s On another note, Sachin Tendulkar is quite close to his imperious best in New Zealand. He may have been around since Dinosaurs roamed the streets and might have scored like 5 million runs, but for an Indian cricket fan, there is little which gives as much pleasure as watching Tendulkar in full flow. He is special.

Oh, Really

I assume he is comparing  millions of students in America who go to public schools to the privileged few in India–admittedly, still a substantial number considering India’s population–who have access to good private schools.

The other couple of hundred million kids who are forced to go to wretched public schools because their parents are too poor to afford anything else and because the policymakers are too busy investing in sexy new IITs and medical schools would be hard pressed to compete with kids in sub-Saharan Africa.

Just ask the folks at Pratham.

This is the Thomas Friedman effect, I suppose.

p.s Here’s how Sweden does it.

Boss ka Boss

Quite funny!

Mere Saajan Hain Us Paar

An absolute favorite.

Err….

Govinda ji speaketh,

They say you didn’t give enough time to your constituency.
No one should comment like that. I stood where no one could and I did this. I will also say that I stood the ground when everyone was running. So don’t ask me how much I walked and why I didn’t run.[link]

There is much else in the interview which is beyond understanding but this part is truly beyond compare.

Be glad he never spoke in the parliament.

What Nonsense!

Fourth, many of us may claim that it is the choice of the girl to live her personal life the way she wants to. But increasing instances of these acts are certainly indicative of the obscenity that has become acceptable in the garb of modernity. Acceptance of vulgar display of skin and sex in advertisements, movies and day-to-day attire makes the younger generation acknowledge the change as a done behaviour. So, a strip tease by a girl for a fellow student should not be alarming for any of us. It should only provoke us to think whether we are moving in the right direction?[link]

It is outrageous that people would invoke their personal sense of morality when dealing with essentially criminal issues. The girl may have agreed to striptease for her bf and  allowed him to film it but it certainly does not follow that she had given him the right to publicly release those videos. The girl’s act was stupid and naive; her bf’s act was despicable and criminal. There is a difference.

What if a person released their spouse’s video shot while they were engaged in certain private acts? Would it be remarkably different from this case? Would it be then be justified to rant against increasing ”obsecenity” in the society?

Womyn are stupid.